quote
follow
|
07-04-2013 You're too nice. The anti-antinatalists on Youtube won't know what do with you, after inmendham. LOL |
|
10-04-2013 Brilliant! Well done, Irina. It's too bad so few people think like us. |
|
10-05-2014 "if you don't believe human agency can not cause an effect i.e. non free will, then why in the hell are you trying to bring about change?"Why do you believe the nonsense concept of human agency/free will is necessary to explain change? Do you not realize that material things change all the time, including human beings and human minds? |
|
10-05-2014 strawman...i'm not arguing that change does not happen. |
|
10-05-2014 ... and I never said you did, either. Read my message again, as it seems you did not understand it at all. |
|
10-05-2014 Why do (YOU) believe the nonsense concept of human agency/free will is necessary to explain change? ...i don't ...you obviously did, see that you remark. but nice try to cover ur ass though. social change can happen depending on a variety of factors. human agency being one of them. it obvious that she intends to provoke social change but this is contrary to non free will. my hypothesis is she feels herself the one whose is thinking, acting, feeling, responding, but according to Determinism she is not. she's is just a vessel being navigated by fate. why be attached? when one is a vessel? but this question assumes she has a choice, attachment vs detachment, which in her theory she does not. but atleast this writing will enter her thoughts and a subtle paradox will ensue a print on the mind that she experiences will might bring about awareness. in a deterministic view it would be wise to let go and let the world happen, but this again assumes she has a choice. i am keenly aware of change. |
|
10-05-2014 Do you not realize that you are contradicting yourself in the very same post? Are you really that dumb?First you said: "Why do (YOU) believe the nonsense concept of human agency/free will is necessary to explain change? ...i don't ..." So you do NOT believe human agency/free will is necessary to explain change. Then you said: "it obvious that she intends to provoke social change but this is contrary to non free will." You DO believe human agency/free will is necessary to explain change. So which one is it, idiot? "in a deterministic view it would be wise to let go and let the world happen, but this again assumes she has a choice." What in the hell are you babbling about? Determinism is just the statement that everything that exists changes (yes, CHANGES) in accordance with cause and effect, including the human mind and human societies. It has nothing to do with fatalism. Go hide under a bush, you lunatic. |
|
10-05-2014 this will be written in hast for i see you reasoning skills are poor this is not an ad hominem for the examples below are proof of such claimi notice several ad hominem statements you made. it's not necessary i.e. absolutely needed . "it obvious that she intends to provoke social change but this is contrary to non free will." You DO believe human agency/free will is necessary to explain change these two togather is a non sequitur argument. Determinism is just the statement that everything that exists changes. thats a false fact. derterminism actually has many definitions some not congruent with each other. Fatalism is a philosophical doctrine stressing the subjugation of all events or actions to fate. This belief is very similar to predeterminism. Predeterminism is closely related to determinism. these are some quotes from wiki and just so you know shes not gonna have sex with you just because you defend her |
|
10-05-2014 Stupid troll is stupid.(Since I don't have enough characters with the line above, I will note one particularly egregious error: you "notice" several "ad hominem" statements? Ad hominem is a fallacy, not a statement. Where the fuck have I committed the ad hominem fallacy, you retard? Go back to Philosophy 101, you imbecilic nincompoop) |
|
10-05-2014 Are you really that dumb?So which one is it, idiot? you lunatic. Stupid troll is stupid you retard all of these are ad hominem statements when a fallacy is written down it becomes a fallacious statement. a kind suggestion would for you to focus on learning or taking away something rather than winning. |
Comments to Do we know enough to stop procreating? (video)