quote
follow
|
20-08-2011 Hello again Irina! :]Sug, don't worry about ur flaws I think u r gorgeous. Honestly your nose looks fine and you do not have belly at all. I am glad that you accept yourself. Remember confidence is the sexiest quality a person can have and yup you have it. :] PS ~ I started commercial modeling even before I can remember so I met lots of people even celebs in my home country but unfortunately a good portion of them were either caked the shit out of their face or had plastic surgery. |
[ link ] |
20-08-2011
Thank you, Naycee. I agree about the value of self-confidence. Never heard about it being the sexiest quality, but that sounds right. I didn't pursue the modeling career as such. Went to some 3 casting calls, done couple of paid assignments and that was it. I decided this job wasn't worth the time and effort. As a hobby and a means of self-expression I like photo modeling much better. This way I can avoid being in those circles that you've mentioned - of insecure, looks and fame obsessed people. Psychologists are much more fun to hang out with um... not all of them, of course))) You still modeling? |
|
21-08-2011 I don't really model anymore because I live in America now and I am focused on my education.I would take pictures for fun but not a lot I don't do commercials anymore simply because I don't have any time I agree psychologist are wayyy better to hang out w/ because they can provide more intellectual and meaningful conversations. I really don't like to chat about how many designer clothes a person has in his/her closet. I also forgot to mention that u look like another Ukrainian model. Her name is Dasha Astafieva |
[ link ] |
21-08-2011
Yup, bragging about the closet contents reminds me of those penis size contests guys have Dasha Astafieva? Hmm... maybe... somewehat... |
|
23-08-2011 Lol atleast the penis contest can actually be humorous the closet contests are just plain boring.I think the reason why I think you and dasha look alike because of the dark hair, light eyes, skin tone ,long legs, and the lingerie |
|
15-11-2011 You have a gorgeous nose, one might almost say it's a defining feature... in a very good way. Just sayin'. |
|
21-01-2012 This is insane! -- You are so beautiful I want to hang myself. |
[ link ] |
21-01-2012
If you saw me in the morning, you'd reconsider. Just ask any of my ex-boyfriends)))) |
|
21-05-2012 These are photos that say to me the person taking them does not know you at all. I can see from these photos that none of your boyfriends have ever opened you up to reveal the woman inside. They are pretty shots but they show no understanding at all about the essence of women. I can see that you are doing your best so it's not your fault but I can also see that there is dishonesty in your relationships and therefore you will not have conquered your anger which is essential for emotional growth. |
[ link ] |
21-05-2012
That's pretty arrogant view. You think you know the essence of women! Ha!)))) Sure, the world is simplier if you decide to overgeneralize and pretend you know things. There are no pictures that 'aren't my fault', because I do not work with bossy photographers who want to stage everything, so those are my moods, expressions and poses on those pictures. |
|
21-05-2012 Hi, I don't mean to be arrogant but I understand that it could come out that way. I know what I'm talking about. I'd send you a link to my site but it's not ready yet. I ended up here because I saw a video of you on Zomobo and I could tell you are trapped in your beliefs.There was one bit where you were talking about women and infidelity and you mentioned something along the lines of there being certain things that are mutually exclusive. Like for example you cannot be faithful to one man while at the same time being able to f*** whoever you like. BUT, you can. The answers are in the paradoxes. Life is far more interesting and wonderful than you can imagine. All will be revealed in my spectacular new all encompassing philosophy. Soon. |
[ link ] |
21-05-2012
Telling someone they're trapped in their beliefs is another arrogant statement. It implies you know better what is and isn't true. I heard about the concept of distinguishing between the 'physical adultery' and 'emotional, or spiritual adultery'. So they say, as long as you only love your partner, you can physically be with everyone you want, thats not cheating. Whatever. Life is interesting all right, but not wonderful. I don't think we're going to agree on much. Especially with your tone of telling people you never met what they can and can not imagine and that they are 'trapped' in their beliefs, but you obviously aren't, so you'll gladly assume the role of a teacher and get off on thinking you've saved a lost soul. You need some confused people with low self-esteen to form your followers base. |
|
21-05-2012 You must agree though that whether "I know better" or not remains to be seen. Maybe I do know better, if you decide I don't then on what evidence do you base the conclusion on other than, dare I say it... a belief. I don't use words like 'spiritual' because it's a fuzzy word without clear meaning and I cherish clarity above all else. Without clarity there can be no understanding because knowledge with doubt is as good as no knowledge at all. The concept I'm talking about is not anything that you would have heard about because it's all new knowledge. OK you seem like a reasonable person so even though my site is not ready you can have sexualphilosophy.com I have a mountain of work to prepare and it's going to be a lot of fun but there's not much up at the moment. Well we won't agree on much by exchanging a few paragraphs here but I'm sure I can convince you that there is much to see. You see you only see what you know and you only know what you see. But I can assure you that the more you look, the more you see. Life just keeps opening out more and more. Everything is amazing. Even air. I mean I never get tired of contemplating even an air molecule. Or a water molecule. Never mind about the complexity of life. Looks at the exciting things happening at the large hadron collider. I won't go on but everything is astounding and it only gets more astounding the more you know. The deeper you look into things the more things open out. Look I'm not going to apologise for my tone, which people are free to take as they like, that is not my problem, if I try and modify myself for the lowest common denominator then I'd never say anything. And besides, if people want to get offended or take something in a way that they choose to then I can't help that. On my site I will be critically analysing stuff from Ph.D's to self proclaimed experts and mocking it mercilessly if it is warranted. Because a lot of stuff that is put out there is pretty silly really. I'm not looking for followers. I'm going to providing practical solutions to common problems. However I'll be dismantling them in ways where people need to really put some effort into thinking about. But you won't find me waffling on with fuzzy meaningless words. It's good to have a bit of frisson in a discussion. You seem like a feisty girl, but as long as I answer your questions directly and don't talk 'bulls*** you'll keep up. Look at this for example http://zomobo.net/play.php?id=b6T_LUkFT60 have you ever heard such unmitigated rubbish in your life. I got off the track a bit but I meant to say, yeah I will be being quite ruthless but it's not directed at anyone in particular, I'll be ruthless to everyone. I'm happy to allow my words to speak for themselves. I know that not many people are used to proper thinking. On my home page there's a little clip by Richard Feynman that explains the problem. |
[ link ] |
21-05-2012
Maybe I do know better, if you decide I don't then on what evidence do you base the conclusion on other than, dare I say it... a belief. The default state is a disbelief. It is for you to demonstrate that you do know better, not for me to disprove it. Something that can be asserted without evidence can be dismissed without evidence. Without clarity there can be no understanding because knowledge with doubt is as good as no knowledge at all. And you base this conclusion on what eactly? This is just silly. It is better to admit what you do not know than pretend you do. When some knowledge is not available an agnostic is an intellectually honest person, and a believer is the one who can't stand the insecurity of not knowing so he manufactures a fable and proclaims it is a knowledge. Then he says 'you can't disprove it, so i is true'. Voltaire was quite comfortable with partical knowledge: "The more I read, the more I acquire, the more certain I am that I know nothing." So was Bertrand Russell when he said "The trouble with the world is that the stupid are cocksure and the intelligent full of doubt." Sorry, I think we're done here. I won't be checking your links, we have almost no common ground. |
|
21-05-2012 Looks like all my paragraph spacing disappeared, that's annoying.>>Without clarity there can be no understanding because knowledge with doubt is as good as no knowledge at all. Think about it. Knowledge requires understanding without any vagueness, doubt or error. This is why it's too much work for most people. Physicists are use to this level of understanding but for most it's too much work. Clarity is a wonderful thing. Most people get angry because of a lack of clarity. My wesite won't be for many people because it irritates people to think. Check out the Feynman video on my site and notice how the BBC interviewer is getting irritated. For no reason except his own insecurity. Anhoo, I gotta go now, nice to chat. I'll be back. I must say the capture codes on your page are really pissing me off. They are impossible. That's why all my paragraph spacing disappeared, it took me 4 goes to get it right. It looks like 21NA but is the second digit a 'one' looks like it but that didn't work. So is it a capital 'i'? |
|
21-05-2012 What's your problem? You radiate insecurity and arrogance. You're also kindof a dick.If you have something to share, tell your friends. I really don't enjoy your pontifications (as one of the readers here) which only do one thing: prop up your desired self-image of superiority. |
|
21-05-2012 Lovely prose John, I "radiate" insecurity and arrogance. "Radiate", gotta love that. And, wait for it... I'm a "dick".That's a pretty persuasive argument there m'boy. Irina is bound to be impressed by your gallant gesture to throw yourself in the mud, as it were, so she can step over you. Irna, while I'm here may I ask you the purpose of these photos. Are they meant to be cute photos of you in your scanties or are they actually meant to be advertising style shots of the lingerie with you as a model. |
[ link ] |
21-05-2012
Irna, while I'm here may I ask you the purpose of these photos. Iconoclast, how come you do not posses this knowledge? I mean, you profess to 'know' things like "none of your boyfriends have ever opened you up to reveal the woman inside" and that "there is dishonesty" in my relationships with the photographer... I mean, just by looking at pictures you're able to 'see' so much. You don't need to ask people anything, just keep telling them the 'truth' that you think you know so much about. Just not on my blog. I don't know why you're still here. You want me cancel your subscription to comments for you? |
|
22-05-2012 You see Irina, instead of saying "you profess to 'know' things", someone with a genuine spirit of enquiry would surely ask, "how can you tell", on the off chance that they may be right.I assume your defensive posture is a mask to try and pretend I have not hit the nail on the head. But do not take this personally, it's not personal at all. In fact I admire your effort to put this blog together as well as the direct to camera clips. So I give you the benefit of the doubt, I give you credit for more intelligence and ability to have your ideas challenged. To learn, to grow. You see most people are like John (see above) almost embarrassingly banal. Just mindless abuse and a mentality to gather people around to support him. Therefore he sees you being a little belligerent and takes the opportunity to suck up to you by not commenting at all on the content of my work but merely to bless me with his mindless abuse. I see this easily because this type of thing has been a part of my research over the years. Because of the image you wish to put forward which is one of genuine enquiry, even in spite of the clues I can see that would negate this, I nevertheless give you the benefit of the doubt. You engage me at first, albeit in a cagey way, then you gradually just revert to type. You are like john but you have a bit more class. All I've done is visit here because you drew me here. You are the one who puts your videos out, so I come across you elsewhere and I assume that you speak the truth. Which is what I do, I always give everyone the benefit of the doubt. Look I can win with you. If I try to give you constructive criticism about your photos, then you call me arrogant. OK, so I try a different tack and ask you a more specific question to tailor what I'm going to say, but then you simply refuse to answer. You see I'm damned if I do and damned if I don't. That is the reason that it's best that I'm just honest and if I'm called arrogant then so be it. Because if I try and pander to people's sensitive egos, if I try to give an opinion that might dent their fragile self image in a more gentle way, it makes no difference. It's pretty clear that you think these photos are very classy and sexy, and all I can say is that they are not bad. You probably just want what you have been getting so far which is just people fawning over you saying how good you look and so forth. You are a pretty girl no doubt about it, but you know what is attractive in people? It's intelligence that is attractive, and as you show yourself to be more like John in attitude you become less attractive. To me that is because for me it's the whole woman that I see not just the surface. I make my original claims because if you ever had a boyfriend who was honest, or indeed if the photographer was honest, you'd be wearing much nicer outfits. You see the underwear you are wearing looks like it's been picked out for you by an advertising agency and you were hired as a model. Therefore if that is your idea of what you yourself to consider to be the sort of lingerie that mean REALLY like then I suggest you check out Gil Elvgren he knew what guys like. I don't get these photos at all. That is why I asked if they are meant to be lingerie shots of shots of you in lingerie. If they are meant to be you modeling lingerie then they are OK, not great, not up to agent provocateur level but the sort of stuff that a had advertising photographer might think looks good in his portfolio. If on the other hand they were meant to indicate what you consider sexy photos then I would be able to give you some useful ideas. However you seem to make the mistake that all women make and that is that they think they know what men really like. There's only one way to find that out for sure. Because of all the above, I therefore conclude that as you don't know then you have had the same sort of relationships that most women have. Shallow and full of dishonesty. Therefore I conclude that in your relationships there will be anger. So when I say what I say it's not from arrogance but from knowledge. You know everyone I've ever met bar one person has been happy to give up their life and their freedom at the alter of their ego. It's a strange and powerful beast. Anyway, I'm still happy to give you some good information if you answer my question. Who knows you might actually end up with something useful on your blog. After all does it make you happy to know you have people like John as your admirers. Peace. |
[ link ] |
22-05-2012
Please feel free to quit posting comments any time. The psychoanalysis from people like you is the last thing I will pay attention to. Please also feel free to think anything you like of me as a person. If you think Im going to be trying to disprove any of your speculations about my character you're mistaken. I have more important and interesting things to do. |
Comments to Lingerie photo session