quote
follow
We're constantly finding ways to be happy with what we've got. No matter what befalls us. We're trying to enjoy the things we can't change. In other words, we're simply adapting to the traps we're in.
But then, wouldn't life itself be one of those things we're adapting to?
Anyway, without further dwelling on the subject (so far), I'm just going to embed this latest video I've made.
More posts from this category: Why humanity is doomedOn the pointless absurdity that life is
|
01-11-2012
Nice video.
I read Gilbert's book a few yrs ago, and I think his conclusions about adaptation are way too optimistic, given the evidence. There is certainly a capacity for hedonic adaptation, and there are well-defined evolutionary reasons for its existence. But it's nowhere near as strong or as resilient as those who make this argument want it to be. The disability/lottery winner study that is so often cited as evidence of hedonic adaptation is riddled with methodological problems. It is true that lottery winners quickly adapt, and are unable to derive continued joy from their newfound wealth. But those with disabilities do not adapt nearly as easily--especially when the disability involves an intolerable limitation on function, or worse, when it involves chronic physical pain. No one can adapt to physical pain--the brain simply does not allow it. The paradox of life is this. The upside is quickly "adapted" away, but the downside is not. Similarly, the upside is capped, but the downside is limitless. We can only feel so much pleasure and satisfaction in a given moment--the rest becomes useless overflow. But there is usually no limit to the amount of pain that our brains can and will produce if things get ugly. Schopenhauer described the asymmetry very well: "While no man is much to be envied for his lot, there are countless numbers whose fate is to be abhorred." In other words, the best life can offer isn't really that good, but the worst that it can offer is truly awful. An excellent argument for antinatalism. A few months ago I stumbled upon the story of a healthy, attractive 24 year old school teacher that dove into a shallow pool at a party and became quadriplegic. There was no "adaptation"--her life became a living hell over night, and stayed that way until she died. She was an artist, and had a talent for describing her experiences, and her frustrations, in her blog. It's heartbreaking to read. She wanted to die, so she ended up starving herself over two months in late 2011, six years after the accident. She died in December. Here is a sample blog post that I think you will enjoy reading: http://lifeparalyzed.blogspot.com/2011/05/reasons-for-suffering-cruel-unusual.html Here is a video special that she did in 2009. http://www.google.com/url?sa=t&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&source=web&cd=2&cad=rja&ved=0CCgQtwIwAQ&url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.ebru.tv%2Fen%2Fgenres%2FLifestyleCulture%2Fsoul-survivors%2Fepisodes%2F1%2F110-christina-symanski&ei=fBOSUOXfKeaFywHu0IGoBQ&usg=AFQjCNEccPWdrwPBeK8wVYDYU6a9CKN0kg Reading her story makes me livid with humanity. To go through what she went through in terms of the loss of her career, her boyfriend, her ability to move her body, the disgusting nature of what she had to endure physically, the pain--and then she is left with no one to blame but herself, which is the natural human reaction. It's a horror show. And then to be given no other escape option other than two months of starvation, because society doesn't have the decency to let her take a sleeping pill and move on? It really is unspeakable, that our world can produce such a bloody mess and then respond so callously to it. Each person trapped in their own universe, thinking they know what is best for the next person (In other words, I don't care how bad things are, find a way to be positive. When you talk down on life, about wanting to die, you make me feel scared that the world is not just after all. You ruin my picnic, my preferred view of life, and you dampen my feelings, which are the only things that really matter in the end). |
Irina |
01-11-2012
In other words, the best life can offer isn't really that good, but the worst that it can offer is truly awful. Great way to put it.
Exactly! Gilbert makes a point than in 1 year their happiness level will be the same. Fine, but how will each of them tend to feel during that year? I imagine the lottery winner will have a much more pleasant road to the same level of happiness than the person who became disabled. The first will have that exalted, unforgettable emotions of 'wow! i won! unbelievable! its me! im the winner! omg! im so happy!' when he will first hear the news. Short lived? Perhaps. But such short-lived but very strong positive emotions are precious, we tend to go back to them in our memories and think 'at least i've experienced that in my life. i don't know if other people were lucky enough, but i was'. And then I would imagine there would be at least a few more pleasant moments of buying the stuff one has always dreamt of, going travelling, celebratng with friends etc... Then the happiness level will gradually decline to level with the disabled guy's a year after. And I don't think it needs to be explained how that other guy's road to the 'average' happiness level wouldn't be so rosy. He, on the contrary, would have to fight depression, the feelings of worthlessness, guilt, helplessness before he can drag himself to the 'normal' state. Comparing just the end result without taking into account the part of life that preceeded it is a little dishonest. The paradox of life is this. The upside is quickly "adapted" away, but the downside is not. Similarly, the upside is capped, but the downside is limitless. Another quotable passage from you. I fully agree. Something from the comment section of Youtube: " Boo hoo.. I'm so sad and it seams that I can never be happy. I've been promised by mommy that I can be whatever I want and that happiness will come to me in the end. Woe is me for even if I'm a beautiful woman, I still am not given everything I can think of on a golden platen, people still claim that I must be responsible for my actions and decisions and thus I am unhappy :(( " Some people can only imagine someone being unhappy when things go wrong in their own lives. They're probably never bothered too much by anything but their own well-being. If someone is beautiful - why wouldn't they simply enjoy their pleasant lives full of opportunities? It's not like they should care about world they're living in and how others have it and what's the point of suffering in this world. No, that's too human! One should be a monkey. Got a banana? Then what are you yapping about? Eat it and be happy! I'm not ready to check out that story you've mentioned yet. I probably will later. But I've seen similar and it was horrible. And the opposition to assisted suicide made it worse, too.
Yeah, it's from this kind of people that I should expect lots of hate for what I'm saying. There they are trying their best to keep their delusion of a just and pretty world going and I'm shaking it's foundation. |
|
01-11-2012
The video link I posted up there appears to be screwed up. Here is the video on youtube. She tells her story:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tGz-ZPrGrWE |
John
|
01-11-2012
Very glad you've done another substantial entry Irina. Unfortunately I can't view the whole video on my slow connection, but I like the start in text. More writing please?
Here's a thought I had in relation: of course what we are, is adaptation, but it brings to question who we are in the first place. There are many people who don't have the thoughts you have because their brains simply haven't developed the 'identity' circuity of individualism that say they are separate from their circumstances or have the right to something more. They are simply a part of what their tribe or community is, and so don't feel trapped, because they don't have this sense of a burdened self, separate. There is an interesting middle ground I think in life where people can have very real success and very real failure. I think we are all much more of a product of our nation, town, group, family, than we'd like to admit.. so our personalities themselves, are adaptations to a trap; not a completely free individual separate from all influence. Then what we are that is NOT an adaptation is very small, I would argue. Everything is in relation to everything else. True happiness I believe is possible, but it would take work and its not a right. It is the constant ability to see something interesting and beautiful in every circumstance, not as delusion but loving work; to make pots from clay. In our constantly upgraded and idealized modern world, we forget that we are animals, once a part of rough and ruthless nature. That we are united in a common struggle against the eons of chaos in forming a continually better future for living things. And so, we continue the life cycle, pointless and profound at the same time. |
Irina |
02-11-2012
Unfortunately I can't view the whole video on my slow connection, but I like the start in text. How about downloading it first? Or do you get billed for traffic? Because there are ways to download from youtube. Used to work. They are simply a part of what their tribe or community is, and so don't feel trapped, because they don't have this sense of a burdened self, separate. Hmm... There may be some truth to that, too.
Sure. I don't think of myself as anythig more than a product of the circumstances I grew in and perhaps some biological legacy. The self still feels real, though. But I imagine how it would feel just as real had it turned out to be drastically different due to the different factors infuencing this particular brain in my head))
|
John
|
01-11-2012
I want to edit, but can't.
I meant to describe a 'making pots from clay' not in a sense like the retarded child who doesn't know better, or the pathetic self-soothing of a damned individual who has nothing better. What I mean is the powerful motive life-force. The act of grabbing the clay to make and create. To dig ones hands in the soil despite whatever is happening. To be alive. To choose. To freedom create good in the face of whatever is happening. |
Irina |
02-11-2012
I think you were clear the first time)) And funny you should mention clay. I really know what you mean. I probably have mentioned this before on my blog, that creativity can bring amazing satisfaction from the whole process that's not just 1 minute long, it lasts and lasts. The inspiration, the curiosity, the discovery, the attention focus - everything united in one state that sort of creates a whole new reality. But it's not really the topic of the video. |
Tim
|
01-11-2012
Nice video, I especially enjoyed the humor. I'd point out that pooping is also a mating strategy, it frees up working memory preoccupied with constipated sensations...releasing it to the play of wit.
Did you know that there is also a psychological bias in which people obsess over bad stuff more than good stuff ? Check it out. Something like 'loss aversion'..they aren't always rational in situations where they may 'lose', not even in gambling with strict odds. I think this is in part also why there is a massive bias towards reporting negative news in the media. It makes sense since some losses, like that of a limb, are catastrophic. But then, not all losses are catastrophic, some risks are rational. Risks on fungible losses are potentially rational ones. I'm wondering - do you think anyone today is truly happy..'legitimately' as you seem to allude to, or are even the flourishing people just playing tricks on themselves? If you think happy ppl are all bonkers, then what would it take to be 'legitimately' happy? Perfect universe? Just wondering...no sarcasm here, I promise. Thanks for the videos, they're great! |
Irina |
05-11-2012
Tim, I'm just replying to your comment for the sake of the readers, I don't expect you to reply after we've had our long discussion in another post. Did you know that there is also a psychological bias in which people obsess over bad stuff more than good stuff ? Check it out. Something like 'loss aversion' I don't think there is such psychological bias. Loss aversion, or risk aversion, can be a strategy, or a predominant motivation to avoid failure. It's not about 'obsessing' over bad stuff (that would be a phobia which isn't a bias, it's a disorder). We have a strong optimism bias most likely because evolutionarity it helped people survive and optimists were the ones who kept trying and fighting and passed on their genes. Those who sat on a rock thinking 'what's the point, life is shit, I'm gonna be eaten anyway' - got eaten more often. massive bias towards reporting negative news in the media. I keep hearing this argument. We've gotten so used to censoring the bad stuff out we consider the overwhelmingly enjoyable content in media a norm! Dozens of entertainment shows going one after another ... but then a little reality check from the news and people call that a 'negative bias'. I guess if news were showing teletubbies jumping that would have been fine and balanced. News are supposed to inform us of the dangers so we can act to protect ourselves and of the current problems we as a society are facing so we can fix them if we so choose and of people who are in trouble so we can help them if we care to. But sure, we can relace the upsetting news with an American Idol why not. some risks are rational sure, but it doesn't have any relation to the subject of the video. I'm wondering - do you think anyone today is truly happy..'legitimately' as you seem to allude to, or are even the flourishing people just playing tricks on themselves? That wasn't the main point either, and I don't have anything against 'synthetic happiness'. The point was precisely the last line in the video "Staying alive and claiming to enjoy it is no more a proof of the wonderfulness of life |
lemon-head
|
05-11-2012
i just want to say your video, put a :-)on my very miserable goofy looking face. thank you very much for the words of wisdom.
|
Irina |
05-11-2012
thank you, it puts a smile on my face to know I don't only create haters for myself but that some people actually find what I say resonating with how they feel/think and helpful. |
Tim
|
06-11-2012
Irina,
I want to apologize for the way I was acting in our discussion before. It was wrong, and some of the taunting things I said were really stupid. There is no excuse for it. I felt a lot of hostility in here and my emotional charge was against the ideas which I find extreme. But I got carried away. I think I was going for the shock treatment, because I take these ideas very seriously and I'm sure other people do and will, too, so I wanted to force their implications out into the open. I didn't understand your perspective at first, either. At first, I had seen a couple of your videos, but then later I came to realize that you might think all life is immoral and I started freaking out. I don't think it was worth it now, but it's too late. Also - I'm not too concerned if my comment goes with the point of your video or not. I just comment what I find interesting, especially seeing as how you seem to like to think a lot. Of course you can delete all my unholy tangents anytime. It won't hurt me. Anyway, the videos are nice and I'm sure the naysayers won't bother you. I only mean to nay-say your ideas, not you, tho perhaps such a distinction is never complete. Also - your English seems very good, so I just gave you the benefit of the doubt and assumed a high level of fluency(and tolerance of my idiosyncrasy) in my comments. I don't know if I was stretching you unfairly there or not, but the way you speak and write ...I can't imagine that I was? Anyway, best wishes. |
Irina |
06-11-2012
Tim, no worries. I have no interest in dramas, I care about the ideas. Sometimes different emotions can appear, we're only humans, but it's good when we're making some effort to concentrate on the arguments and whether or not they make sense regardless of how they make us feel.
I like to keep my comment section relevant to the subject of the post. In almost any forum there is a topic, this way it's easier to follow and more pleasant to read. So I will have to either delete or move (if there is a relevant other entry) offtopic comments. Also - your English seems very good It is, at least when I read/write. But regardless, people don't always understand each other even if they speak one language, that's normal. |
Tim
|
The tragedy of life as you mentioned is that life is an imposition and its not easy to kill yourself to get out of it...
Personally, I can't really enjoy life no matter how happy I get sometimes because, well, its all pointless. I was born for no reason and I will die for no reason.
Existence is just a curse.